Dorms with No Liquor Or Drugs College housing choices may rank near the top the list of items that can influence your higher education experience. Your memories of dorm, Greek or living that is off-campus stay with you the rest in your life and make for some interesting — and colorful — stories to talk about together with your kids and friends since the years go on.

At some colleges, because of problems connected with over-enrollment, residing conditions have begun down rather rocky. At Penn State’s University Park campus some years back, dorm area had been therefore scarce that a number of incoming first-years had to call home in a screened-off section of the primary student union building. Exactly How strange is the fact that?

At Princeton University, the overflow of enrollees one year needed a gathering of modular domiciles (a.k.a. ‘trailers’) on a previous field that is athletic leading to what looked like a small retirement community for older people. There were some disparaging remarks made about those atypically housed first-years, the majority of which came from all of those other Princetonians who lived into the splendor that is gothic of other vaunted residential universities.

There is certainly one choice, however, that, I would definitely pursue because of its overall qualities and promise: substance-free housing (SFH) if I were headed to college today,. If you should be active in the university process at this time or know an individual who is really a university student whom lives on campus, you have probably heard about SFH. The facts and what could be some pros and cons about it?

Think of University Stereotypes

What’s one of the most images that are common comes to mind whenever you picture stereotypes of university life? Fraternity parties? Empty alcohol kegs flying through windows? Staggering students? The scent of hops, barley and smoking or marijuana smoke permeating the air? Stereotypes occur for a reason. They are sometimes quite alarmingly accurate. Think Animal House.

If you should be turned off by most of these habits, then you can wish to explore the SFH options during the colleges to that you’re considering using or where you choose to enlist this springtime. I did so a search for schools that provide substance-free housing and, as usual, I was overwhelmed with links. One website link that arrived up had been that one, which had a partial but list that is interesting of. Here’s a sampling:

Albright College (learning, Pa.): Single-sex floors, apartments. Honors, first-year, substance-free and break housing

Bucknell University (Lewisburg, Pa.): Substance-free, Judaic studies, Afro-American studies and ecological housing that is cooperative

James Madison University (Harrisonburg, Va.): Theme housing for international, learning and substance-free, and second-year experience communities. Fraternity houses located off campus

ny University (nyc, N.Y.): Wellness, theme, substance-free, first-year experience, sophomore experience, living learning and co-ed housing

Babson College (Babson Park, Mass.): Substance-free, discounted and special-interest housing

Is SFH Effective?

The greater cynical in our midst may concern the effectiveness of SFH. I’ve heard doubters say that some SFH residents live where there are not any ‘substances’ but then wander away from their SF dorms and check out parties in some places. Thus, they cite an element of hypocrisy. Just What do a little news state on how well SFH works?

‘ … it does change lives., as it ends up,’ states This new York days. ‘No one claims that students who live in substance-free housing abstain from smoking, having a drink or drugs that are using. But at the very least according to one study, they don’t really indulge as much as others. A 2001 study of more than 14,000 students nationwide unearthed that, in contrast to other pupils, only how do you do a literature review three-fifths as much residents of substance-free housing reported binge drinking in the last a couple of weeks.

‘There had been other benefits, too. Students in substance-free housing, the study discovered, were less inclined to experience alcohol-related dilemmas, like getting behind in schoolwork, damaging property, engaging in trouble with all the authorities or riding having a driver that is drunken.

‘There is, of course, a chicken-and-egg element to these findings. Students dreaming about an university experience that bears some relationship to Animal House aren’t prone to choose for substance-free housing. …

‘ … At many campuses, residents of regular dorms, and even those assigned to substance-free housing they didn’t request, state they’re glad the option exists.

”I think it is good that universities have a health option,’ stated Beatrice Capestany, a freshman who was assigned to your wellness corridor of Vassar’s sole staying dorm that is all-female although she did not request it. ‘My dorm is just a place that is really good keep coming back home to if I’ve gone away. It smells a lot nicer than various other dorms, too.’ On that same wellness corridor, Victoria Ramsey and Kathryn Thomas, both freshmen, could never be more satisfied with their option.

”i don’t drink or smoke, and our corridor is quiet and clean,’ said Ms. Ramsey.

‘Ms. Thomas included: ‘I wanted a peaceful spot for learning. Often it’s really a refuge, for folks who come and remain till they know the celebration on their floor has died down.”

Okay. This is the side that is positive of SFH coin. To keep fair and balanced, let us take a good look at the flip part, and a few points from Andrew Gottlieb’s Why substance free housing is a idea that is bad

‘ I happened to be amazed to discover that substance residents that are free permitted to drink, and much more surprised to discover that many do take in. Even despite these surprises, my freshmen experience has led me to just take issue that is serious the idea of substance-free housing. It is just unnecessary, unjust and divisive to designate entire floors as substance free.

‘ … If someone is company in his / her choice not to ever partake in ingesting, he/she could achieve this no matter where he/she lives. She prefers not even to have alcohol in the room, there could be an option to choose a substance free roommate, without designating entire floors as substance free if he or.

‘The substance designation that is free unfair because often the decision to live on a substance-free floor isn’t left in the possession of of the pupil. I’ve met many students whoever parents forced them to call home on a floor that is sub-free or worse, I have met students who did not ask to reside for a sub-free flooring but were put on one anyway mainly because Residential Life had a need to fill spaces. College is just a destination where at long final, young adults achieve full independency. Creating a living option which may be better than many moms and dads but not to ever kids is just a disservice to students as well as an intrusion in the liberty that college claims. …

‘ … truth be told that throughout almost every Wash. U. graduate’s life, they have to work with and probably live with or near those who do not accept their personal decisions about liquor and other substances. a crucial chance to plan this part of life comes in college. The chance to live with, comprehend and respect the various alternatives of the classmates is invaluable. Washington University should recognize this crucial opportunity and change its housing policies, which currently hamper it.’

Gottlieb confirms that some SFH residents do, certainly, imbibe, which somewhat substantiates the hypocrisy argument, although you’ve got to understand the intent of every university’s SFH rules therefore the motives of these who elect to live here (and perhaps the perspective of those who have been quartered there being a matter of random positioning).

Some Schools Have Contracts

If you are into highly quantified thinking about SFH, then you may care to always check the Journal out of Studies on Alcohol, funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The Harvard Gazette sources that and attests towards the aspect that is positive of whenever it notes:

Residents of college housing where smoking and alcohol were banned had been less likely to be victims of actions by pupils have been consuming. Findings through the Harvard class of Public wellness university Alcohol Study show that substance-free college residence halls are making a direct effect into the effort to cut back the harms that hefty consuming creates among university students. It was the study that is first have a nationwide consider the relationship between substance-free dorms plus the effects of alcohol on university campuses. …

Do SFH residents need to make a pledge which they will adhere to the guidelines of the college’s SFH charter? Listed here is an example of exactly how Davidson College handles the SFH ‘contract’ [see my bold emphasis]:

You can expect substance-free housing for anyone students who would like to reduce their visibility in their living environment to alcohol and behavior that is alcohol-related illicit medications and smoking materials. Pupils staying in these communities agree to perhaps not use liquor or drugs on their flooring community nor bring the effects of those substances back in the hall.

A hyperlink towards the substance-free housing application are included in a contact from Jason Shaffer. Halls and/or floors to be designated as substance-free are going to be determined after applications are gotten.

All pupils selecting a substance free assignment is going to be needed to finish a substance free housing agreement. Failure to uphold the objectives will result in relocation likely to some other project.

The school Confidential conversation forum members have debated the pros and cons of SFH. Here are a few commentary from this thread that is informative

‘Our child was afraid to choose sub-free her freshman 12 months it really meant in terms of the types of kids that she’d be paired with because she wasn’t sure what. It was too basic at her college. a “quiet dorm” would’ve been something she’d likely have selected, but “sub-free” seemed too basic. Despite the fact that she actually is not really a partier, she has buddies who are. Within the end, she regretted maybe not choosing it, I do believe. But it really is determined by the educational school therefore the kid.’

‘At both my youngsters’ big state universities, all of the dorms had been officially called ‘substance free’ but that did not stop kids from doing what they wanted to do. My son knew some dudes that got kicked from the dorms into the semester that is first of year one for cannabis usage as well as the other for drinking …’

‘My daughter did substance housing that is free first couple of years at a little liberal arts college. The children had to sign an agreement which they would not take in or smoke cigarettes inside or return to the dorm beneath the influence (or bring other people back under the impact). There was no stigma, just a good quiet dorm without crazy events. Like other people said, no vomit within the spaces that are public vandalism damage. Best part was no body ever pulled the fire alarm the night’

So, when you are considering your college housing options, it could spend to look at how (or if) substance-free housing would fit into your plans. Most of the information you need to decide about this can be obtained on your own universities’ housing webpages. Check it out!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *